MESTI BACA - Surat Dari PERKASA Buat POPE Ketua Kristian Dan Gereja Dunia

Perkasa hantar surat ke vatican

KUALA LUMPUR 30 Jan. - Bagi mendapat kepastian penggunaan kalimah Allah di kalangan penganut agama Kristian, Presiden Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Negara (Perkasa), Datuk Ibrahim Ali telah menulis surat kepada Pemimpin Vatican, Pope Benedict XVI.

Surat setebal empat muka surat yang dihantar pada 15 Januari lalu turut menerangkan situasi terkini di Malaysia berhubung isu kalimah Allah selain meminta penjelasan pemimpin Vatican itu mengenai kewajaran tuntutan penggunaan kalimah tersebut di kalangan masyarakat Kristian.

Katanya, tindakan itu dibuat agar masyarakat Kristian di negara ini tidak memandai-mandai dalam membangkitkan sesuatu isu yang boleh menimbulkan ketegangan.

''Sebagai pemimpin tertinggi Kristian, saya mahu tahu pendapat beliau berhubung perkara ini.

''Bagaimanapun terpulang kepadanya sama ada mahu membalas surat itu atau tidak,'' katanya kepada Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini.

Beliau yakin surat itu telah sampai kerana ia tidak dikembalikan semula kepadanya.

''Saya juga menggunakan khidmat penghantaran antarabangsa dan mempunyai alamat penghantar di belakang sampul surat itu," katanya.

Menurutnya, antara yang dipersoalkan dalam surat itu ialah nama tuhan Kristian, adakah tertulis dalam kitab-kitab Kristian bahawa Allah adalah tuhan Kristian dan sejak bila Pope Benedict membenarkan gereja menggunakan perkataan Allah bagi menggantikan perkataan tuhan.

Ibrahim dalam surat itu turut menyatakan, kesudian Pope Benedict memberi maklum balas berhubung perkara tersebut akan dapat menyelesaikan isu kalimah Allah di negara ini

MESTI BACA - Surat Dari PERKASA Buat POPE Ketua Kristian Dan Gereja Dunia

Monday, February 1, 2010

Klik Gambar

Klik Gambar


Klik Gambar


Klik Gambar

Ini merupakan surat yang di utuskan Dari Presiden PERKASA Dato Ibrahim Ali kepada Pope Paul Benedict XVI Ketua Agama Krstian dan Gereja Seluruh Dunia.

Diharapkan seluruh rakyat Malaysia terutamanya mereka yang masih keliru ataupun ragu ragu tentang isu penggunaan kalimah Allah oleh Majalah Herald milik Gereja ini bolehlah membaca kandungan surat ini dan Fahamai serta perhalusi tiap soalan yang di ajukan oleh Dato Ibrahim Ali Presiden PERKASA Malaysia.

Bekas peguam Petronas kecewa royalti Kelantan dinafi

| Print |

E-mail

M Faqih & Mohd Nor Yahya

KOTA BHARU, 28 Feb: Bekas Ketua Jabatan Undang-Undang Petronas, Nik Syaghir Nik Mohd Nor melahirkan rasa dukacita apabila ada pemimpin menafikan hak Kelantan ke atas royalti minyak. Beliau berkata, pemimpin terbabit dianggap menafsir undang-undang tanpa melihat kepada maksud dan tafsiran sebenar Akta Kemajuan Petroleum 1974 (PDA). Katanya, akta tersebut menyebut dengan jelas perkataan onshore (daratan sehingga tiga batu nautika) dan offshore (perairan negeri). “Saya hairan mengapa mereka termasuk juga yang bergelar profesor di universiti tidak merujuk kepada perkataan tersebut. “Saya cukup sedih dengan tindak tanduk mereka yang cuba mengelirukan rakyat. “Sedangkan pada 1975 Menteri Besar Kelantan, Datuk Mohamad Nasir memberi hak kepada Petronas mencarigali minyak yang di kawasan onshore dan offshore,” katanya pada taklimat mengenai tuntutan royalti petroleum kepada wakil-wakil rakyat di Bilik Gerakan Negeri di sini, petang tadi. Hadir sama bekas peguam kanan di Jabatan Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman dan peguam kes tuntutan royalti minyak Terengganu, Thommy Thomas. Selain itu, Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Tuntuan Royalti Minyak Kelantan, Datuk Husam Musa, dua Adun BN iaitu Datuk Norzula Mat Diah (Paloh) dan Mohd Yusoff Abdul Ghani (Nenggiri) serta wakil-wakil rakyat lain. Turut hadir pegawai-pegawai kerajaan negeri, pusat serta wartawan tempatan. Nik Syaghir berkata, kesanggupannya menjelaskan perkara sebenar di sebalik tuntutan royalti minyak Kelantan semata-mata bagi menegak kebenaran setelah ada pihak yang mengelirukan rakyat dalam isu berkenaan. Beliau yang juga pernah berkhidmat sebagai pegawai undang-undang Perbendaharaan Negara dan Jabatan Peguam Negara memberitahu sebelum ada PDA kerajaan Sabah dan Sarawak sudah menandatangani perjanjian dengan Shell. Katanya, ketika itu Shell dikehendaki membayar royalti kepada Sabah dan Sarawak sebanyak 8 hingga 12 peratus mengikut jarak lokasi carigali dengan pantai. “Mengambil kira perkara tersebut saya ketika itu dipertanggungjawab merangka draf mengenai PDA telah mengambil jalan tengah dengan memutuskan Petronas perlu membayar royalti 10 peratus iaitu 5 peratus kepada pusat dan 5 peratus lagi kepada negeri. “Lagi pun Tun Razak tidak mahu ada keistimewaan tertentu dalam PDA. Kesemua negeri mempunyai hak yang sama di bawah PDA dan jelas tidak ada keistimewaan seperti digambarkan pihak tertentu,” ujarnya. Abdul Aziz juga menegaskan pembayaran royalti kepada negeri tidak menggunakan kaedah 3 batu nautika seperti yang diuar-uarkan pemimpin kerajaan pusat sekarang. Katanya, pembayaran yang dibuat berdasar kepada istilah onshore dan offshore serta tidak berbangkit sama sekali kaedah 3 batu nautika. “Kalau ada pendapat menyebut royalti hanya dibayar apabila carigali dijalankan kurang 3 batu nautika, itu pendapat yang salah. “Kerajaan pusat, negeri, Sabah dan Sarawak semua mendapat 5 peratus. Tidak benar sama sekali ada perbezaan royalti di antara Sabah dan Sarawak dengan negeri di semenanjung dalam soal ini,” ujarnya. Thomas pula menjelaskan biar pun isu royalti diketengahkan ke mahkamah bagi mendapat keadilan, kerajaan negeri atau mana-mana pihak masih boleh untuk memperkatakan isu berkenaan. Katanya, tidak ada subjudis kepada mahkamah dalam isu berkenaan biar pun hakim belum membuat apa-apa keputusan. “Ini sama seperti berlaku di Perak baru-baru ini. Isu berkenaan diperkatakan secara meluas dalam ceramah, forum dan seminar,” ujarnya. Sementara itu Husam berkata, Kelantan akan menggunakan rundingan bagi menuntut royalti dan tindakan mahkamah merupakan jalan terakhir. Bagaimanapun katanya, kerajaan akan mendapat pandangan dari semua Adun terlebih dahulu sebelum kes berkenaan dibawa ke mahkamah. Ditanya kenyataan Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Wang Ihsan, Datuk Dr Awang Adek Hussin yang tetap mahu menghantar surat jemputan pelantikan wakil kerajaan negeri dalam jawatankuasa berkenaan kata Husam surat tersebut tidak ada dilayan. “Kita berpendapat jawatankuasa itu haram dan tiada dalam undang-undang, bahkan bayaran 5 peratus yang mereka ambil itu juga haram,” katanya selepas mesyuarat Exco sebelum itu. ---------------------------- http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=25237:bekas-peguam-petronas-kecewa-royalti-kelantan-dinafi&catid=1:utama&Itemid=50

Qazaf Vs Sumpah laknat

Post Last Edit by kekbelacan at 28-1-2010 10:09 SAIFUL BUKHARI : UMNO NAK BUAT AGAMA BARU KE? Dalam Facebook saya berdebat dengan ramai puak-puak UMNO ni dalam berbagai topik. Bila timbul topic tuduhan liwat Anwar dan Saiful Bukhari, mati-mati mereka mempertahankan bahawa Anwar bersalah kerana Anwar tidak bersumpah. Saya tanya pada mereka, ini ugama baru ke yang UMNO hendak bawa? Sejak bila dalam Hudud, sumpah laknat boleh dipakai sebagai bukti? Siapa yang ajar? Malahan,kalau Saiful Bukhari bersumpah di Masjidil Haram atau Masjidil Nabawi sepertimana yang beliau bersumpah di Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan, beliau tidak sempat keluar pintu masjid sebelum beliau ditangkap oleh Polis Agama Saudi (Al Mutawwa). Ini kerana mamat Saiful telah melakukan QAZAF dan JUGA MENGAKU MELAKUKAN ZINA/LIWAT. Kalau beliau bernasib baik, beliau hanya akan dikenakan hukuman sebat 80 kali untuk Qazaf. Tapi, kalau nasib tak baik, beliau akan dikenakan hukuman rejam sampai mati untuk pengakuan beliau melakukan seks sesama jenis. Kalau di Afghanistan beliau akan ditolak dari helikopter dari 20 ribu kaki. Dalam hukum hudud, kalau kita pergi bersumpah laknat sekalipun menuduh seseorang berzina, hakim akan meminta kita memberikan 4 orang saksi. Kalau kita gagal bawa, hakim akan mengarahkan hukuman 80 sebat untuk qazaf dikenakan ke atas kita. Sumpah laknat kita tidak bermakna dalam hukum hudud walaupun sedikit. Hakikatnya pengikut-pengikut UMNO mengikut agama yang diajar oleh pimpinan-pimpinan mereka. Mereka tidak mengikut Islam dan tidak mengikut kehendak syariat Islam. AGAMA BARU BERNAMA AGAMA UMNO? kredit to Anon ( http://www.papagomo.com/2010/01/ ... n-anwar-brahim.html) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Soalan: Peliwat perlu di adili secara qazaf atau cukup setakat sumpah laknat ? http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=464142

Pelik Tapi Benar ?

KUALA LUMPUR, 22 Feb: Para peguam Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim diminta supaya menyiasat satu blog yang mendakwa mempunyai bukti penipuan orang yang menuduh Datuk Seri Anwar meliwatnya iaitu Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

Blog itu, milosuam.blogspot.com memaparkan perbualan antara seorang blogger, Papagomo dengan Saiful Bukhari melalui facebook.

Berikut adalah rakaman perbualan melalui facebook yang disiarkan oleh blog Milosuam itu.

Sumber :

http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=25115:blogger-dedah-perbualan-saiful-dengan-blogger-umno&catid=1:utama&Itemid=50

Six Jewish Companies

Six Jewish Companies Control 96% of the World’s Media

The power of lies, deceptions and disinformation as Americans pay the price of collective stupidity.

“You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel…” Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache

Facts of Jewish Media Control

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney Empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a “control freak”, includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies. As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers. When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic sex and violence. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies. ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, a Jew.

This corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable companies. ABC Radio Network owns eleven AM and ten FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates. Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications, Chilton Publications, and the Diversified Publishing Group. Time Warner, Inc, is the second of the international media leviathans.

The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network. Warner Music is by far the world’s largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner Music’s video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are Jews. Warner Music was an early promoter of “gangsta rap.” Through its involvement with Interscope Records, it helped popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites. In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing. Time Warner’s publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune).

When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews.

To block Turner’s bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), a Jew, is the third largest megamedia corporation in the country, with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and Pocket Books.

It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores. Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the younger television audience. With the top three, and by far the largest, media companies in the hand of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part. What about the other big media companies? Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox Television and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter Chermin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew. Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof, a Jew. Alan Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division. Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,” is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew. The best known of the smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair.

Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr., who is also president of the World Jewish Congress. It is well known that Jews have controlled the production and distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century.

This is still the case today. Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above-Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram)-accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office receipts for the first eight months of 1995. The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson, CBS first by William Paley and then by Lawrence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert. Over periods of several decades, these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong. As noted, ABC is part of Eisner’s Disney Company, and the executive producers of ABC’s news programs are all Jews: Victor Neufeld (20-20), Bob Reichbloom (Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan (World News Tonight). CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Nevertheless, the man appointed by Lawrence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro (Dateline).

The Print Media After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500 different publications. One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against Jewish control and distortion. However, this is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of our interests than a casual observer would think.

The days when most cities and even towns had several independently owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the community are gone. Today, most “local” newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or ever thousands of miles away. The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country’s 1,500 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest depend on these few for all of their national and international news. The Newhouse empire of Jewish brothers Samuel and Donald Newhouse provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America’s daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip.

The Newhouses own 26 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation’s largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country’s largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group.

This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue–not the small change collected from a newspaper’s readers–that largely pays the editor’s salary and yields the owner’s profit. Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the 20th century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers–primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants. Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America’s newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation’s three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three, dominating America’s financial and political capitals, are the newspapers which set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn’t, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it, and all three newspapers are in Jewish hands. The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones’s estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper’s current publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld.

Both of the latter are also Jews. The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe; twelve magazines, including McCall’s and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines. Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its “leaks” throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government.

The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John McLean, and later inherited by Edward McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier. The Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer’s daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co.

In 1979, she appointed her son Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation’s number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation’s largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation which also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron’s, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal. Most of New York’s other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The New York Daily News is owned by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm.

Other Mass Media

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report. Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a susidiary of Time Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew. Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham.

Its weekly circulation is 3.2 million. U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is owned and published by Mortimer Zuckerman, a Jew. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York’s tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country. Among the giant book-publishing conglomerates, the situation is also Jewish. Three of the six largest book publishers in the U.S., according to Publisher’s Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews. The three are first-place Random House (with its many subsidiaries, including Crown Publishing Group), third-place Simon & Schuster, and sixth-place Time Warner Trade Group (including Warner Books and Little, Brown). Another publisher of special significance is Western Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S. publishers, it ranks first among publishers of children’s books, with more than 50 percent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew.

The Effect of Jewish Control of the Media

These are the facts of Jewish media control in America. Anyone willing to spend several hours in a large library can verify their accuracy. I hope that these facts are disturbing to you, to say the least. Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power? Certainly, not and allowing a people with beliefs such as expressed in the Talmud, to determine what we get to read or watch in effect gives this small minority the power to mold our minds to suit their own Talmudic interests, interests which as we have demonstrated are diametrically opposed to the interests of our people. By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media, we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by their parents, their schools, or any other influence.

Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar

Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar (May Allaah protect him) has not been captured by the enemies of Islam One of the worlds leading propaganda media outlet The New York Times has citied U.S. government officials who are claming that Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar (May Allaah protect him) of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has been captured in Pakistan by The United States and Pakistani intelligence forces in a secret joint operation in Karachi, he has been in Pakistani custody for several days and was being interrogated by Pakistani and U.S. intelligence. Theunjustmedia.com on Rabi' al-awwal 03, 1431 A.H, Wednesday February 17, 2010 verify this news with the official spokesman of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan Zabihullah Mujahid.

Theunjustmedia.com: The Americans are claiming to have captured Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar (May Allaah protect him) is this true.

Zabihullah Mujahid: No this is not true, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar (May Allaah protect him) is safe in Afghanistan, from where he is carrying on with his duties in librating Afghanistan from the invaders. This latest propaganda by the Americans is to divert the attention of the world from their defeats in Marjah and to bring down the morals of the Mujahideen, but the enemy is forgetting that the Mujahid Nation of Afghanistan jihad is not an aspiration of one individual, but the aspiration of a whole Nation. The Mujahideen who are participating in this Jihad are not participating because of one individual, but because this is their Allaah's (SWT) given right, and the enemy has failed to comprehend this reality, thus it is facing defeat internally and externally.

The truth seeking citizens of this world are fully aware of American propaganda, as they have time to time witnessed the unfolding truth of their pervious propagandas. The media outlets which are today proclaiming the captured of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar (May Allaah protect him) are the same media outlets which not to long a go claimed that Iraq had Weapons Of Mass Destruction, but later the whole world witnessed this to be not true. So, we ask the concerned citizens of this world, what will it take for you to start calling liars as liars, because those media outlets which are claiming the capture of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar (May Allaah protect him) are just that "liars", their abomination to journalism.

http://www.theunjustmedia.com/

Hamid Gul: Taliban is the future

Lieutenant-General Hamid Gul was a military commander in the Pakistani Army in the 1980s, and served as the head of the country's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency from 1987 to 1989. But Gul's rise to fame came during the Pakistan-Saudi-US effort to keep funds and logistical support flowing to the Afghanistan mujahidin, who were eventually credited with defeating Soviet military and political forces. During the Bush administration, the US sought to put Gul on a UN list of international terrorists but their efforts were blocked by the Chinese delegation. Domestically, Gul has been an outspoken opponent of Asif Ali Zardari, the Pakistani president, and has called for the Supreme Court to be reinstated as the rule of law in Pakistan. Al Jazeera interviewed Gul during a short visit to Doha. Al Jazeera: You recently said 'the Taliban is the future, the Americans are the past in Afghanistan'. Isn't that a little far-fetched? Hamid Gul: The Americans are defeated. It isn't necessarily because their firepower and their might has weakened, but it is because their own people are sick and tired [of engagement in Afghanistan]. There is fatigue now, fatigue is the threat and is the worst thing for a nation to suffer from. There is no way that the Americans can hold on to Afghanistan. Could that lead to [Afghanistan President] Hamid Karzai's government being toppled? Karzai is no more. He is now fighting for his life. They have already started telling him that by the end of this year he will have to shoulder the responsibility of security in Afghanistan. But what are they giving him for this? Nothing at all. In fact, more civilian casualties in military operations are going to weaken Karzai's position. Some in Afghanistan believe that the extent of civilian casualties has empowered the Taliban's resurgence. Hamid Gul says the latest US offensive against the Taliban will not work It is not only that. While the civilian casualties have certainly made the Taliban a popular movement in Afghanistan - some 80 per cent of the population support them - the people of Afghanistan are fed up with corruption. They are sick of the influence of warlords and drug barons, and the continued American occupation. If it was a shot stint - come in and get out after completing the job - the situation would have been different. But the Americans didn't do that. If they wanted to disperse al-Qaeda, they succeeded after the first year, and after that they should have pulled out. The fact they stayed on betrays their real intentions in Afghanistan until Barack Obama, the US president, came and started talking about withdrawal. It was only last December that Obama announced that the US will pull out of Afghanistan. Hillary Clinton said the same thing, but there is a dichotomy. On the one hand they say 'We are not here to stay in Afghanistan', but on the other hand they carry out surges and want to prop up and build the Afghan Army. However, they don't give the money to build the Afghan Army - just $140mn. Compare this to how much it costs the US to keep just one soldier in Afghanistan - $1mn dollars per soldier per year in Afghanistan. They have now about 68,000 US troops. It is currently costing them $65bn just to maintain these troops. There are another 30,000 US troops now coming, so it will cost the US $100bn a year to maintain its forces in Afghanistan. The US is a heavily indebted nation so how are they going to afford this? Some 57 per cent of Americans in the polls say they don't like this war and want their boys to return home. The Americans can't take casualties, that is their problem. To compensate, they started employing security contractors, some 104,000 security contractors currently in Afghanistan. What does this mean? Mercenaries to be used where troops cannot be deployed? We have already seen what mercenaries did in Iraq. The Americans are more and more inclined - because the US military cannot suffer casualties - to employ mercenaries, not just from the US but also from the local population. This is a very dangerous trend if we are to believe that mercenaries can win wars and carry forward the political objectives of the country. This means that whoever has more money can employ more mercenaries, win wars, win territories, etc. Given everything you have just said, how do you think the latest US and Nato offensive against the Taliban is going to play out? It is not going to work. I think it is an 'eye wash', it has political purpose back home. But there is no political purpose for Afghanistan. They are saying that they are protecting the civilian population, but they are dislodging the civilians from their homes in very harsh weather conditions in Afghanistan. The cold winds from the steppes of Central Asia sweep these regions. When you launch such military operations, the people are inevitably dislodged and their fields abandoned. In this situation, what are the Americans trying to achieve - I don't know. There is much ambiguity about their political objectives. Every military conflict must have a political purpose. I cannot discern that there is any political purpose. Civilian casualties in US/Nato operations have weakened Karzai [EPA] From a strategic point of view, Pakistan's involvement in Afghanistan has been seen as setting up a buffer, or deterrent, to India. But now that Pakistan has nuclear capability, how important is Afghanistan to Islamabad? We want a friendly Afghanistan. We know India is playing havoc with us. The Pakistani Taliban are being sponsored by the Indian intelligence and the Mossad, by the way, to carry out their attacks in Pakistan. The Mossad is very active in Pakistan and they are providing all the guidance and technical support to the Indian intelligence. So, Pakistan has to have its back covered - no country can fight on two fronts. We have to have a friendly Afghanistan, this does not mean that we dominate Afghanistan. No one can dominate Afghanistan, a country which has already buried two superpowers and the third one is about to be buried there. No, that's not the purpose Pakistan has in Afghanistan. Is the failure to stabilise Afghanistan adversely affecting Pakistan's own security? Yes, indeed it is. The conflict is not just derivative of the failures of the Kabul government - that is a puppet government. The real cause of the conflict is the occupation of Afghanistan by the Americans. If they go out, and after such a time - post-US occupation, the OIC and the Muslim countries have to come in and play their part. Then Afghanistan can redeem itself. I do not think that Afghanistan will be another Vietnam for the Americans because they have said they will pull out. Obama is a president who is very clear. In his State of the Union address, I think it was clear he was not addressing terrorism but instead focusing on such internal issues as healthcare, unemployment and debt servicing. It appears he is more focused on the domestic front than foreign affairs. You can't focus on both at the same time. There has been a surge in violence in Pakistan since the exit of Pervez Musharraf, the former president. The Pakistani Taliban threaten towns and cities, and there are tensions between the PPP and MQM in key ports like Karachi. What is needed to stabilise Pakistan right now? Political cleaning up of the mess. The rule of law must take root in Pakistan. Unfortunately, the more powerful among the politicians and generals, when it comes to their turn - whether by martial law or civilian democracy - they want to run the affairs of the country according to their own predilections and propensities. And that is where we go wrong. The political institution has to be set right; the Supreme Court and Parliament must be empowered. Right now, all the power is vested under the 17th Amendment, which was an amendment to the constitution passed by the dictator Musharraf in 2003. This gave more power to the office of the president and the ability to bypass the constitution and remain in leadership irrespective of elections. Asif Ali Zardari, the Pakistani president, now has that power and he is refusing to budge. So, the 17th Amendment has to go, Parliament has to be empowered, rule of law by the Supreme Court has to be established and the army must not interfere. Then things will begin to fall in place and we will take the right direction. Do you think the US is helping Zardari stay in power because he is seen as co-operating in the so-called war on terror? Gul: Public opinion is against Zardari; he may not survive politically until the next elections I think there is ambivalence in their position and they sometimes do criticise him. The American press has in the past bashed Zardari, but it has gone quiet now. The Americans fear the return of the Supreme Court in Pakistan because it could rule that the US drone attacks are violations of the country's sovereignty. If that happens, Parliament would have to act on the Supreme Court's decision and reverse the policy. The Americans are sceptical and suspicious that if the Supreme Court is given free reign in Pakistan, it is likely to rule against their interests and agenda in Pakistan. Do you think the government will survive until the next national elections? The government will survive but I am almost certain Zardari will not. I do not want to appear to be clairvoyant, but I doubt Zardari has many days left in government. In recent years, US officials have accused you of having close ties with the Taliban and al-Qaeda. How do you respond to that? No, this is wrong, I have no such ties. As far as al-Qaeda is concerned, I simply say come up with the evidence for 911. You haven't even charged Osama bin Laden so far, that means you don't have hard evidence against him. The full story is yet to come out. In my opinion, all this is a gimmick, an inside job. In regards to the Taliban, I support their cause of Afghan resistance. I lend them my moral support because I have in the past had strong connections with them. Incidentally, I maintained strong connections with both sides. Many in the Afghan government are my good friends. But since the Taliban are representing the national spirit of resistance, I have given them my voice. The Americans sent my name to the UN Security Council to put me on a sanctions list and declare me an international terrorist. But they failed because the Chinese knew the truth well and blocked that move. Basically, the Americans have nothing against me. I saw the charges and I replied to them in the English-language press in Pakistan. I said if they have anything against me to bring it forward, put me on trial. Tell me what wrong I have done. I have been taking moral stands. The Americans talk of freedom of speech, but apparently my speech hurts them because it counters their excesses. I won't use the word 'interests' because what US policy-makers are doing runs against the interests of the American people. If I say this is right and this is wrong, I am exercising my right and ultimately, this is to the benefit of the American people. But Zardari once told a western journal that you are a "political ideologue of terror". I wrote a letter to Zardari that I am an ideologue of jihad, which is common between us. He is a Muslim like me and believes in the Quran. Terror is a totally different thing. I do not support terror at all, but jihad is our right when a nation is oppressed. According to the United Nations Charter, national resistance for liberation is a right. We call this a jihad. http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2010/02/20102176529736333.html

Altantuya Murder Conspiracy (1)

Bala confirms it: Nasir Safar among last to see Altantuya alive

| Print |

E-mail

Freemalaysiatoday.com

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 10: Private investigator P. Balasubramaniam has confirmed that Nasir Safar (picture) was at the scene when policemen abducted Mongolian beauty Altantuya Shaariibuu, according to his lawyer, Americk Sidhu. Sidhu, in an email to the Pakatan Rakyat weekly Suara Keadilan, said the private eye — known throughout Malaysia by his nickname Bala — made the connection recently when he saw a photograph of the former special aide to the Prime Minister posted on a blog. Nasir was thrust into notoriety last week after delivering a talk that many have described as full of racial slurs. He has had to resign over the incident, which embarrassed premier Najib Abdul Razak’s 1Malaysia project. Both Bala and Sidhu live outside Malaysia for fear of persecution by the Najib regime, to which the police force, the attorney-general and the judiciary are widely suspected to be fiercely loyal. In the now famous statutory declaration that he made in July 2008, Bala said he was at the scene when police took Altantuya away in a car from outside the home of her Malaysian lover, Abdul Razak Baginda, then an aide of Najib

anwarVSsaiful (5)

Ugut bunuh: Anwar anggap laporan Saiful aneh

| Print |

E-mail

Dzulfikar Mashoor

KUALA LUMPUR, 10 Feb: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim menyuarakan rasa aneh dengan niat saksi utama kes liwat, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan membuat laporan polis kononnya diancam bunuh oleh seseorang rakan maya di Facebooknya. "Yang meragukan adalah Facebook dan blog saya itu diikuti rakyat 60,000 hingga 70,000. Jadi kalau begitu, ada seorang buat catatan (dalam Facebook) dan dalam masa singkat hilang namanya, tetapi dalam masa yang singkat itu dia beri e-mail kepada Saiful bagi saya begitu aneh," jelasnya di lobi Mahkamah Kompleks Kuala Lumpur tengah hari ini. Pun begitu, beliau yang juga Ketua Pembangkang meminta pihak polis menyiasat kes tersebut, termasuk e-mail misteri yang diterima Saiful. "Mengenai laporan (Saiful), tak apalah, biarkan polis siasat, kena siasat siapa yang hantar e-mail kepada Saiful," jelasnya. Sebelum itu, Anwar turut menjelaskan bahawa Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur menangguhkan perbicaraan kes liwat sehingga 18 Februari ini. Tambahnya lagi, penangguhan tersebut bertujuan membuat ketetapan sama ada menerima permohonannya untuk mengetepikan Hakim Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Md Diah daripada mendengar perbicaraan atau sebaliknya. Kata Anwar lagi, peguambelanya Karpal Singh telah pun menghantar afidavit balas pada jam 9.30 pagi tadi, walaupun pasukannya bercadang menghantar afidavit itu petang semalam

معجم "عمدة الحفاظ في تفسير أشرف الألفاظ"

	-
التعريف بالمؤلِّف هو شهاب الدين أبو العباس أحمد بن يوسف بن محمد بن مسعود (1) المعروف بالسمين الحلبي ثم المصري الشافعي (2). \"تاريخ ولادته غير معروف، لكن المؤرخين يتفقون في سنة وفاته (756هـ) في القاهرة (3). \"يجمع المؤرخون على أن نشأة هذا الرجل كانت في حلب، وقد اكتسب فيها لقبه (السمين)، ثم يذكرون أنه رحل إلى القاهرة، وأقام فيها بقية حياته، حتى إنه لم يعرف بـ(الحلبي)، وإنما أصبح (المصري). ويبدو أنه حظي بمكانة بارزة في أثناء استقراره في مصر، فقد وَلِيَ تدريس القراءات والنحو بجامع ابن طولون، كما ولي نظر الأوقاف بالقاهرة، وناب عن بعض القضاة، كما أنه استلم التدريس في مسجد الشافعي، وتنقل في المدن المصرية؛ فرحل إلى أستاذه العشاب بالإسكندرية ليقرأ عليه الحروف. ويذكر المؤرخون أن له باعاً طويلاً في علم القراءات حيث تولى تدريسها، ومن خلال قراءتنا في كتابه \"الدر المصون في علوم الكتاب المكنون\" نجد تعمقه فيها؛ متواترها وشاذّها؛ حتى لا يكاد تخفى عليه ضبطاً وتوجيهاً، وقد ترك كتاباً في هذا الفن باسم \"شرح الشاطبية\"؛ وصفه ابن الجزري بقوله: \"شرح لم يُسبق إلى مثله\". أما في التفسير فقد ألَّف فيه كتابين: الأول في عشرين مجلداً، والثاني في عشرة مجلدات. وهذا يكشف عن سعة ثقافته العلمية في هذا العلم. كما يشيرون إلى تعمقه في علمي الأصول والحديث؛ حيث إنه درَّس الأول في مساجد القاهرة, وأخذ الثاني عن رجاله. ويبدو أن الرجل قد فقه علوم العربية وتمثَّلها, وكتابه \"الدر المصون\" خير شاهد على ذلك (4)، وكذا كتابه الذي بين أيدينا \"عمدة الحفاظ\". التعريف بالمؤلَّف عنوان الكتاب: عنوان الكتاب الكامل هو: \"عمدة الحفاظ في تفسير أشرف الألفاظ\". وقد أشار السمين إلى تسميته في مقدمته للكتاب (5) دون ذكر أي تعليل لهذه التسمية، أظن ذلك لسبب بسيط؛ هو كون العنوان اسماً على مسمى, واضح الدلالة؛ فالعمدة: ما عليه الاعتماد. وبالفعل فالكتاب يُعتمد عليه خير اعتماد فيما يخص معجم مفردات القرآن الكريم، لا غنى لعالم حافظ عنه فبالأحرى طالب علم. منهجه: \"بدأ المؤلف كتابه بفهرس دقيق للمواد التي تناولها في كتابه, وهذا الفهرس يدل على دقته وحسن تبويبه وتنظيمه. وذكر في خطبة الكتاب أنه رتب مواد كتابه على حروف المعجم, إلى أن ينتهي ذلك مع ما بعده, وهلم جرا إلى أن تنتهي حروف المعجم جميعاً. ويتابع القول عن منهجه في عرض المادة اللغوية: \"وإن عثرت على شاهد من نظم أو نثر أتيت به تكميلاً للفائدة, وإن كان في تصريفها بعض غموض أوضحته بعبارة سهلة إن شاء الله, وإن ذكر أهل التفسير اللفظة وفسَّروها بغير موضعها اللغوي كما قدمته تعرضت إليه أيضاً؛ لأنه والحالة هذه محط الفائدة\" (6). وذكر في المقدمة أن الذين سبقوه إلى وضع التصانيف مثل الراغب في \"مفرداته\", والهروي في \"غريبه\", والسجستاني في \"غريبه\" لم يتمُّوا المقصود لاختصار عباراتهم. ورأى أن الراغب كان أفضل من كتب في هذا الموضوع, ولكنه مع ذلك أغفل في كتابه ألفاظاً كثيرة وردت في القرآن، ولم يوردها في \"مفرداته\", وذكر السمين بعض المواد التي غفل عنها الراغب. وإذا ما قلَّبنا صفحات كتابه نجده في بعض المواد يفصِّل القول في قضية نحوية مثل حديثه عن (ما)؛ فقد تحدث عن أنواعها وشروطها, وكذلك الهمزة وغيرها. وقد يقتضب القول ويحجم عن الإسهاب ويقول: \"ليس هذا موضع تحقيقه\", وذلك مثل ما ورد في حديثه عن (بئس) واتصال (ما) بها, وفي الحديث عن (إيا) يقول: \"وفي الكلمة كلام طويل حررته في غير هذا الكتاب\". وفي حديثه عن (إن) ومعانيها يقول: \"ليس هذا موضعها لضيق الزمان بتصريفها, لاسيما مع عسره\". وأحياناً نجده يستفيض قليلاً, وذلك مثل مادة (لعل), (اللهم), (الإنسان)؛ فيذكر آراء أئمة النحو من المدرستين البصرية والكوفية, ويتضح لنا من خلال مناقشته للآراء النحوية حول هذه المسألة أو تلك أنه بصري المذهب. ونجده في بعض المواد يذكر القراءات القرآنية لآية ما؛ فتارة يقتصر القول ويقول: \"قرئت بالكسر والفتح\" في مثل قوله تعالى {يا أبت}. وفي قوله تعالى:{أفمن أسَّس بنيانه} يقول: \"قرئت {أسَّس} بالبناء للفاعل والمفعول\". وقد يشبع القول في عرضه لقراءة ما, مثل قوله تعالى:{فصرهن إليك}، وقد أوردها في مادة (ص و ر), فيعرض أقوال الأئمة ويناقشها, ذاكراً الحجج التي تؤيد كل قراءة. وقد يحيل إلى أحد كتبه؛ ففي مادة (ض ر ر) بعدما ذكر قوله تعالى: {ولا يضار كاتب ولا شهيد} نجده يقول: \"بيَّنَّا ذلك بياناً شافياً في \"القول الوجيز\"\". وفي التفسير قد يحيل إلى أحد كتبه, ففي حديثه عن قوله تعالى: {ألم} يقول: \"للناس فيها أقوال كثيرة فصَّلتها في \"التفسير الكبير\" إلى نحو ثلاثين قولاً\". ومن ناحية أخرى اهتم المؤلف بنسبة الشواهد الشعرية والنثرية إلى أصحابها, غير أنَّا بالتتبع الدقيق لما أورده؛ ثبت لنا أن المؤلف قد أورد بعض الشواهد منسوبة إلى غير أصحابها, أو غير منسوبة بتاتاً (7). \"وكان يتناول فيه اللفظة القرآنية بالدرس والتفصيل, ويعرض استعمالها وتطورها مدعومة بالشواهد, فيقول مثلاً: مادة كذا, لها معاني كذا, وأصلها واستعمالها كذا, واعتمد على أصول الكلمة دون زوائدها\" (8). القيمة العلمية للكتاب أهمية الكتاب: \"الكتاب في مضمونه معجم لغوي, والمعاجم العربية تمثل جهوداً مشتركة لعدة علماء, وليست هي مجهود فرد بحدِّ ذاته. ولابد لمن يضع معجماً من أن يكون عالماً وعارفاً بالمعاجم التي ألفت قبله، مع الإلمام بكتب اللغة وعلومها, ليستفيد منها, ويتابع فيها حيث توقف غيره, فيضيف إلى ما فات مَن سبقه. وقد أتقن السمين الحلبي الاستفادة من كتب التراث؛ فعرف كيف يجمع مادة كتابه ويرتبها, ليضعها بين أيدي المهتمين بهذا العلم. وتبرز أهمية الكتاب في عدة جوانب, منها: - اللهم: وهي المسألة (47) في \"الإنصاف\". - الاسم: وهي المسألة الأولى في \"الإنصاف\". - الإنسان: وهي المسألة السابعة في \"الإنصاف\". - اللام في (لعل): وهي المسألة (26) في \"الإنصاف\". - بعض الأسماء الخمسة: وهي المسألة الثانية في \"الإنصاف\". وغير ذلك من القضايا النحوية التي دار خلاف حولها بين المدرستين البصرية والكوفية. ملاحظات حول الكتاب: يقول محمد باسل عيون السود: \"ذكر السمين في مقدمة كتابه أن الراغب أغفل في كتابه ألفاظاً كثيرة لم يتكلم عليها, ولا أشار في تصنيفه إليها, مع شدة الحاجة إلى معرفتها, وشرح معناها ولغتها, مع ذكره لمواد لم ترد في القرآن الكريم. وبالقراءة المتأنية لكتاب \"عمدة الحفاظ\" وجدت أن ما ذكره السمين ينطبق عليه هو نفسه أيضاً, فقد فاته أن يذكر عدة مواد, ذكر بعضها الراغب, وغفل عنها الراغب والسمين وهذه المواد هي: توراة، جوف، دأب، دب، دبر، دثر، دحر، دحض، دحى، دخر، دخل، دخن، درأ، درج، درر، درس، درك، درهم، سلح، لدن، لذذ، مخض، مرأة، مرو، نمرق، هزل، هيأ. وقد فات المؤلف أن يذكر الأعلام الواردة في القرآن مثل: مريم، يسع، يثرب، يوسف. ومع أن المؤلف قد أخذ على الراغب أنه يذكر موادّ لم ترد في القرآن الكريم, فإنه قد حذا حذوه في هذا الخطأ, فقد أورد مادة (غ ر ض) مع أن القرآن قد خلا من هذه المادة. وبالمقابل فإنه أورد مادة (س هـ ل)، (ر ع ب)، ولم يذكر لهما شاهداً من القرآن\" (11). خاتمة تبين لنا من خلال الحديث عن الكتاب موسوعية هذا الرجل, وباعه الكبير في شتى العلوم الإسلامية, خاصة العربية منها والقرائية، ليحتل بذلك المكانة المرموقة والعالية ضمن جهابذة علمائنا العظام. وإن كانت ثمة سلبيات في الكتاب, ذُكرت, وقف عليها النُّقاد الأفذاذ, فلا يعني هذا بتاتاً الإنقاص من قدر الرجل, ولو قيد أنملة, بل ذاك يضاف إلى سجل حسنات الرجال من باب \"كفى بالمرء نبلاً أن تُعَدَّ معايبه\" و\"المجتهد إذا أخطأ له أجر\" فالكمال لله وحده, والعصمة لأنبيائه ورسله. 1- يجد طالب مفردات اللغة ضالَّته في هذا الكتاب؛ فهو يلتقي بتحليل مفصَّل لكلمات القرآن وأصولها واشتقاقاتها وتطورها واستعمالاتها. والكتاب يعين على جانب التفسير، وإن لم يكن يؤلف مرجعاً رئيساً فيه. 2- غناه بغريب الحديث؛ فكل مادة من مواد هذا المعجم غنية بغريب الحديث الذي يسوقه المؤلف لتأييد قضية لغوية. 3- غناه بشواهد العربية؛ فقد ضم حوالي (1900) شاهد شعري. حتى إننا نجد معظم الشواهد المتناثرة في كتب النحو قد احتواها \"عمدة الحفاظ\". كما أننا نجد الكثير من الأشعار النادرة التي لا نقف عليها في كتاب آخر وصل إلينا؛ مما يدل على سعة اطلاع المؤلف واهتمامه بتعزيز مذهبه أو الدفاع عنه. 4- غناه ببحوث النحو العربي؛ التي نجدها في كتاب \"الإنصاف في مسائل الخلاف\", مثل مسألة: 5- يتضمن الكتاب الكثير من الإشارات البلاغية, وهذا ما يعزز قيمة الكتاب؛ فقارئه يطمح إلى التعرف على سر التعبير القرآني واختياره المعين, والسمين وإن لم يكن مجلياً في هذا العلم, فإنه كان يقتبس نصوصاً بلاغية كثيرة, ولعل \"أساس البلاغة\" للزمخشري كان معيناً ثرياً لاستقاء شواهده الشعرية هذه\" (9). Publish Post

anwarVSsaiful (4)

Feb 2, 10 9:09am

Perbicaraan hari ini mendengar hujah kedua-dua pihak dengan pihak pembela menggesa Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi, Datuk Mohamad Zabidin menangguhkan perbicaraan kes liwat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Tindakan itu bagi membolehkan mereka untuk mendapatkan permohonan semakan di Mahkamah Persekutuan. Antara bukti tambahan yang dipohon oleh Anwar ialah rakaman video, nota ahli kimia dan laporan perubatan Dr Osman Abdul Hamid dari Hospital Pusrawi.

Mahkamah juga hari ini mendengar hujah pendakwa bahawa kononnya dubur Saiful dimasukkan dengan plastik adalah tidak benar.

Berikut rentetan peribicaraan hari ini.

3:35 petang: Mahkamah ditangguhkan. Perbicaraan bersambung semula esok pada jam 2.30 petang.

3:30 petang: Hakim Mohd Zabidin memutuskan menolak permohonan penangguhan dan berkata perbicaraan akan diteruskan.

Karpal memohon keputusan ditangguhkan sehingga pertemuan dengan presiden mahkamah rayuan.

Bagaiamanapun hakim menolak permintaan itu dan berkata dia tidak boleh menangguhkan lagi kes ini.

3.20 petang: Hujah berakhir. Mahkamah berhenti seketika sebelum hakim Mohd Zabidin membuat keputusan berhubung penangguhan.

3:15 petang: Mohd Yusof berhujah tiada peruntukkan khas bagi membenarkan permohonan penangguhan berkenaan.

Katanya, laporan perubatan yang dimilikinya tidak menyebut bahawa plastik dimasukkan ke dalam dubur Saiful.

3:10 petang: Pendakwa raya utama, Mohd Yusof memulakan hujahnya.

2.50 petang: Karpal menyerahkan dua laporan perubatan yang menunjukkan tiada bukti kesan kemasukan di dubur Saiful.

"Tembusan adalah elemen penting. Tidak mungkin disabitkan kesalahan. Tiada hakim yang akan mengabaikan bukti itu," katanya.

"Malah jika ada memanggil 1,000 saksi, apa yang asas ialah laporan perubatan menunjukkan tiada

kesan kemasukan."

2.45 petang: Peguam bela Karpal Singh memberitahu mahkamah pihaknya gagal menemui Tun Zaki tetapi sebaliknya diarah berjumpa dengan presiden mahkamah rayuan, Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff.

Memandangkan Alauddin mempunyai jadual rawatan gigi hari ini, pertemuan diaturkan esok.

2:35 petang: Perbicaraan bersambung semula.

10:44 pagi: Penyokong mula bersurai tetapi masih ada yang menunggu sambil menyanyikan lagu Suara Rakyat di pintu masuk bangunan mahkamah. Polis masih mengawal dan tiada kekerasan dilaporan sepanjang pagi tadi.

10:34 pagi: Anwar meninggalkan mahkamah dengan laungan "Hidup Anwar" oleh kira-kira 50 penyokongnya. Wartawan ditegur polis kerana 'merosakan' garisan kuningnya manakala 40 wakil rakyat pembangkang yang berada di situ 'ditegur' kerana didakwa membuat bising.

10:25 pagi: Anwar berucap pada penyokongnya dengan berkata peguamnya akan memanggil Najib dan Rosmah sebagai saksi kerana dia mempunyai bukti bahawa Saiful berjumpa kedua-dua mereka, dua hari sebelum laporan polis dibuat. "Kami mahu tahu pembabitan mereka dalam perkara ini. Mereka tidak menafikan pertemuan itu dan kami mahu tahu lanjut," katanya.

10:11 pagi: Tian Chua dan pemimpin PKR yang lain meluru ke lobi mahkamah. Sambil berdiri di tangga, mereka membidas kerajaan dan menyeru penyokong mempertahankan Anwar. Mereka juga mengibarkan kain rentang berbunyi 'Himpunan bantah fitnah ke-2'. Pergelutan kecil berlaku apabila polis cuba merampas kain rentang berkenaan. Namun mereka dihalang oleh penyokong PKR. Polis membiarkannya dan hanya memanatu keadaan. Ucapan Tian Chua diteruskan.

9:50 pagi: Hakim Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah menangguhkan prosiding sehingga jam 2.30 petang, di mana peguam Anwar dijangka berhujah bagi menangguhkan prosiding.

9:45 pagi: Peguam Anwar - Karpal Singh - memohon untuk menangguhkan prosiding pagi ini ekoran temujanji dengan Ketua Hakim Negara Tun Zaki Azmi berhubung semakan semula keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan Jumaat lalu yang menolak permohonan Anwar untuk mendapatkan dokumen berhubung kes liwatnya.

9:26 pagi: Buat pertama kalinya, Musyidul Am Pas, Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat menghadiri perbicaraan kes liwat Anwar, tiba.

9:18 pagi: Pasukan pendakwaraya dan peguam masuk ke dewan mahkamah.

9:17 pagi: Anwar sempat berjenaka dengan Ragunath apabila gagal membuka pintu kamar perbicaraan. Beliau berseloroh: "Kamu lebih berpengalaman, selepas 11 tahun, saya masih tidak dapat membukanya".

9:00 pagi: Pemimpin-pemimpin Pakatan, Menteri Besar Selangor Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim, pemimpin popular DAP Lim Kit Siang, presiden PKR Datuk Seri Wan Azizah Ismail, timbalannya Dr Syed Husin Ali dan Setiausaha Agung PKR Saifuddin Nasution Ismail semuanya sudah tiba di mahkamah.

8:51 pagi: Ketibaan Anwar, anggota keluarganya dan Lim disambut dengan laungan "reformasi" dan hidup Anwar".

8:46 pagi: Pihak pendakwaan Nordin Hassan dan Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden tiba di mahkamah.

8.42 pagi: Presiden Majlis Peguam Ragunath Kesavan tiba sebagai pemerhati untuk kes berprofil tinggi itu.

8:35 pagi: Ketibaan pemimpimpin-pemimpin Pakatan, Dr Syed Husin Ali dan dua exco kerajaan Selangor Elizabeth Wong dan Dr Xavier Jayakumar.

8:33 pagi: Anwar, Wan Azizah dan dua anaknya keluar daripada rumah mereka di Segambut.

8:25 pagi: 50 penyokong berkumpulan di sekitar bangunan mahkamah

8:15 pagi: Beberapa wakil rakyat PKR berkumpul di rumah Anwar.

8:00 pagi: Bapa kepada Mohd Saiful Bukhari, Azlan Mohd Lazim tiba.

7:57 pagi: Pihak diplomat daripada Britain, Jepun, Switzerland, Kanada tiba, lebih ramai dijangka hadir.

7:55 pagi: Kira-kira 30 penyokong PKR dan 10 wartawan masih beratur bagi mendapatkan pas masuk.

7:43 pagi: Polis hanya membenar 30 wartawan mengikuti perbicaraan, setiap organisasi hanya dibenarkan menghantar seorang wartawan

7:00 pagi: Anggota keselamatan telah berkumpul di sekitar kompleks mahkamah tersebut. Kawalan keselamatan ketat.

Wartawan telah sedia menunggu sejak daripada jam 6.25 pagi lagi.

anwarVSsaiful (3)

Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata beliau telah meminta peguamnya, Karpal Singh supaya mensapena Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak dan isterinya, Datin Rosmah Mansor untuk menjadi saksi dalam kes liwat terhadapnya.

Anwar yang juga ketua umum PKR berkata, beliau mempunyai bukti untuk menunjukkan bahawa Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, telah menemui Rosmah dan kemudian Najib, dua hari sebelum membuat laporan polis.

"Kita mahu tahu pembabitan Rosmah dan Najib dalam hal ini.

"Mereka tidak menafikan pertemuan tersebut dan kita mahu tahu," katanya.

Kemudiannya, ketika berucap kepada penyokongnya, Anwar berkata: "Biar mereka datang buat penjelasan apa yang sebenarnya berlaku.

"Mereka mesti hadir jelaskan keadaan," katanya.

Anwar mengakhiri ucapannya dengan laungan bersama penyokongnya "lawan tetap lawan".

Pada Julai 2008, Najib yang ketika itu timbalan perdana menteri, mengakui bahawa Mohd Saiful adalah menemuinya di kediamannya beberapa hari sebelum membuat laporan polis.

Najib mendakwa beliau telah menasihatkan Mohd Saiful supaya membuat laporan polis tetapi menafikan beliau terbabit dalam konspirasi terhadap Anwar.

Sebelum itu, Najib telah mengakui bahawa beliau juga telah bertemu dengan Mohd Saiful di pejabatnya di Putrajaya.

Mohd Saiful, bekas pelajar Universiti Tenaga (UNITEN), ketika itu mahu mendapatkan bantuan Najib untuk memperolehi biasiswa kerajaan.

anwarVSsaiful (2)

Peguamcara negara Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden berkata pihaknya mempunyai bukti yang kukuh dalam bentuk spesimen air mani bagi mendakwa Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim memang meliwat bekas pembantunya, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

“Pihak pendakwa akan membuktikan kes ini melalui laporan kimia yang menunjukkan air mani diperolehi daripada mangsa,” kata Mohd Yusof yang mengetuai pasukan pendakwa raya dalam perbicaraan yang secara rasmi bermula esok.

“Terdapat spesimen yang dikeluarkan dari dubur mangsa. Ini akan membuktikan tembusan memang berlaku,” katanya.

“Apa yang dimiliki oleh pasukan pembela adalah hanya laporan awal daripada doktor yang merawat Mohd Saiful tetapi ia tidak termasuk laporan kimia berhubung spesimen air mani,” tambahnya.

Mohd Yusof berkata perkara berkenaan akan dibuktikan ketika perbicaraan apabila doktor dan ahli kimia memberi keterangan.

Mereka akan menunjukkan bagaimana tembusan tehadap mangsa dilakukan.

anwarVSsaiful (1)

http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/123552

Mohd Saiful Bukhary Azlan memulakan keterangannya dalam perbicaraan kes liwat terhadap Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim hari ini, dengan menceritakan tentang dakwaan ajakan seks oleh ketua pembangkang itu.

Mohd Saiful adalah pengadu dalam kes tersebut dan merupakan saksi pertama pihak pendakwaraya. Anwar dituduh melakukan kesalahan tersebut di Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara, antara 3.01 petang dan 4.30 petang 26 Jun 2008.

Pertuduhan itu dibuat mengikut Seksyen 377B Kanun Keseksaan yang membawa hukuman penjara sehingga 20 tahun dan sebatan jika disabit kesalahan.

Dalam kenyataan pembukaannya, Peguamcara Negara, Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abidin berkata pihak pendakwaraya akan membuktikan bahawa kesan air mani Anwar ditemui dalam dubur Mohd Saiful.

Katanya, kesan air mani itu diperolehi oleh doktor dari sampel tisu.

Mohd Yusof berkata, pihak pendakwa akan membuktikan kesnya melalui keterangan oleh Mohd Saiful dan laporan ahli kimia, pakar forensik dan doktor.

Menurut Mohamed Yusof berkata, pihak pendakwaraya akan memanggilkan lebih 20 saksi untuk memberi keterangan dalam perbicaraan tersebut, yang didengar di hadapan Hakim Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah.

Dalam keterangannya, Mohd Saiful menceritakan bagaimana dengan bertemu dan Anwar dan bekerja dengannya.

Pada 26 Jun, katanya, dia diarahkan bertemu dengan Anwar di kondominium Desa Damansara pada jam 2.30 petang, untuk berbincang
tentang tugasnya.

Mohd Saiful berkata dia telah menyerahkan beberapa dokumen kepada Anwar dan Anwar berkata: "Can I f*** you today?"

Walaupun dia 'takut dan tidak mahu", Mohd Saiful berkata, dia mengikut juga arahan Anwar dan membersihkan diri dalam bilik air serta keluar dengan memakai tuala dan masuk ke dalam bilik tidur.

"Saya nampak Anwar memakai tuala. Dia mendekati saya dan memeluk saya," katanya.

Ketika itu, Karpal memohon supaya baki keterangan Mohd Saiful dibuat secara tertutup. Hakim Mohamad Zabidin bersetuju dan menangguhkan prosiding sehingga jam 9.30 pagi esok.

Walaupun hujan lebat, para penyokong Anwar berhimpun dekat pintu masuk kompleks mahkamah. Dua penyokongnya kelihatan memakai topeng Najib dan Rosmah. Polis mengeluarkan amaran tangkap.

Sebelum itu, peguam Karpal Singh membuat bantahan kerana laporan polis menyebut kejadian liwat itu didakwa berlaku pada kira-kira jam 6 petang, yang berbeza dengan waktu yang tercatat pada kertas tuduhan.

DPP Mohd Yusof menjawab banyak insiden yang berlaku. Katanya, laporan polis itu merupakan bukti utama, yang membawa polis melakukan penyiasatan.

Mohd Saiful memulakan keterangannya dengan menceritakan mengenai latar belakang pendidikannya kepada DPP kanan DPP Mohd Yusof.

Katanya, dia tercicir dari Universiti Tenaga kerana keputusannya yang teruk.

Dia kemudiannya menunjuk ke Anwar ketika diminta mengecamnya. Anwar tidak memandang ke arahnya.

Sebelum itu, ketika Mohd Saiful melangkah ke kandang saksi, kedengaran seseorang melaung "taubatlah", menyebabkan mukanya berubah.

Mohd Saiful berkata, dia bekerja untuk Anwar sebagai seorang sukarelawan seminggu sebelum pilihan raya umum Mac 2008, dengan gaji RM1,000.

Selepas pilihan raya tersebut, dia menjadi pengawai khas, dengan tugasw mengatur perjumapan dengan ahli-ahli parlimen BN yang berkemungkinan melompat parti.

Beliau meletak jawatan pada bulan Jun, atas alasan "malas dan tidak berdisiplin".

Tetapi hari ini Mohd Saiful berkata sebab sebenarnya ialah "kerana tidak tidak tahan diliwat".

Ketika pemeriksaan utama Mohd Yusof, Mohd Saiful berkata pelawaan Anwar itu dibuat selepas beliau menyerahkan dokumen yang dibawanya dari pejabat kepada Anwar.

Mohd Yusof: Apa buat dengan dokumen bila masuk?

Mohd Saiful: Saya duduk di meja tersebut bertentangan dengan Anwar dan serahkan dokumen.

Mohd Yusof: Duduk, letak dokumen, apa lepas itu?

Mohd Saiful: Lepas serah dokumen, kami bincang tentang jadual kerja, tidak lama lepas itu beliau tanya satu soalan.

Mohd Yusof: Apa soalan itu?

Mohd Saiful: Can I f--- you today?

Mohd Yusof: Apa reaksi kamu ketika diajukan soalan itu?

Mohd Saiful: Marah dan takut.

Mohd Yusof: Ada kamu kata apa-apa?

Mohd Saiful: Tolak pelawaannya.

Mohd Yusof: Apa kamu kata bila menolak?

Mohd Saiful: Saya kata saya tidak mahu melakukannya.

Mohd Yusof: Anwar kata apa-apa bila kamu kata tidak hendak melakukannya?

Mohd Saiful: Dengan nada marah, Anwar kata "what" (apa)?

Mohd Yusof: Apa respon kamu?

Mohd Saiful: Saya ulang yang sama.

Mohd Yusof: Seterusnya?

Mohd Saiful: Anwar agak marah, dengan itu saya takut. Anwar arahkan ke bilik tidur utama.

Mohd Saiful berkata beliau kemudian mengikut arahan Anwar dan Anwar selepas itu menutup langsir dan lampu bilik.

Beliau berkata Anwar seterusnya meminta beliau untuk membersihkan dirinya di bilik air.

Mohd Yusof: Masa itu dah buka pakaian?

Mohd Saiful: Ya.

Mohd Yusof: Lepas bilas diri?

Mohd Saiful: Saya ambil tuala dalam tandas, saya keluar dengan bawa baju kemeja saya warna putih dan gantung di tempat pemegang almari.

Mohd Yusof: Kamu bertuala?

Mohd Saiful: Saya bertuala.

Mohd Yusof: Masa keluar dari bilik air, nampak di mana Anwar?

Mohd Saiful: Saya nampak, Anwar di hujung penjuru katil, di bahagian kaki sebelah kanan.

Mohd Yusof: Apa Anwar buat pada masa itu?

Mohd Saiful: Dia berdiri pakai tuala putih dan mengarahkan saya untuk pergi dekat dia, lalu dia peluk saya sambil berdiri.

Ketika itu, peguam Karpal Singh yang mewakili Anwar membuat permohonan agar prosiding seterusnya dijalankan secara tertutup.

Check this out !!!!

Perhaps this webpage would soon be blotted out ...or banned ?

http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24751:of-nasir-najib-1malaysia-and-the-altantuya-link&catid=41:utama-muka-depan&Itemid=125

STATUTORY DECLARATION

I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at [deleted] do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-

1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.

2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.

3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.

4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.

5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.

6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.

7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.

8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.

9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.

10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.

11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.

12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.

13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.

14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.

15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.

16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.

17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.

18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.

19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.

20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.

21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.

22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.

23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.

24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.

25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-

25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.

25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that [deleted by nat out of respect to the family of the deceased].

25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.

25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.

25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.

26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.

27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.

28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-

28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.

28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.

28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.

28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.

6. That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.

28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.

30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The driver’s window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.

31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.

32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.

33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.

34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.

35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.

36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.

37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.

38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 – 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.

39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.

40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.

41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.

42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.

43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.

44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.

45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.

46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.

47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.

48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.

49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.

50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- “ I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.

53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.

54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-

54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.

54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.

54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.

SUBCRIBED and solemnly )

declared by the abovenamed )

Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]

this day of 2008 )

Before me,

………………………………….

Commissioner for Oath

Kuala Lumpur